Con 3 The Electoral College ignores the will of the people. First, the argument.

Why the Electoral College Is Bad for America: Amazon.de: Edwards, George C.: Fremdsprachige Bücher It’s just this. This proves the system is working. The electoral process can also create a larger mandate to give the president more credibility; for example, President Obama received 51.3% of the popular vote in 2012 but 61.7% of the electoral votes. NPR's Steve Inskeep talks … But then I will counter some good counter-arguments sent by thoughtful Quorans I respect, who happen to not agree with me on this issue. In the U.S. democracy, the Electoral College chooses the president. That means the candidate with the most total votes may not win the election. In his book Why the Electoral College Is Bad for America, author George Edwards argues the system may be outdated and irrelevant in today's political climate. [14] In 227 years, the winner of the popular vote has lost the electoral vote only five times.

Why the Electoral College Is Bad for America Book Description: A new edition of the best†'known book critiquing the U.S. electoral college In this third edition of the definitive book on the unique system by which Americans choose a president-and why that system should be changed-George Edwards includes a new chapter focusing on the 2016 election.

Here is a list of every argument for against electing presidents by national popular vote – and why all of them are wrong.

I will give the most direct argument I can.

Undoubtedly, some who make such statements also believe the Senate is undemocratic because it lacks proportional representation. Elizabeth Warren wants to abolish the Electoral College.

Many say that the Electoral College is undemocratic and that a popular vote concept is democratic, which is why states should dump the former.